Is Boredom Transhistorical?

As we suffer through yet another week without work, that divine gift of capitalist modernity, we long for the return to normalcy, for the end of this boredom. But what is boredom, and why is it so painful?

Linguistically speaking, the word “bore” as a noun that described someone or something that was tiresome or dull first appeared in the 18th century, a reference to the slow process of boring a hole into some piece of material. By the mid 19th century, the modern definition of “boredom” as the state of being bored was established, and has since been something that must be avoided at all costs. But why? To answer that, we must investigate the opposite of boredom, productivity,[1] and see how that concept has been historically constituted.

In capitalism, productivity, defined as the tendency of people towards activity, reigns supreme as the highest goal any person can strive for, a natural characteristic of all human beings who ever lived. But productivity is not natural at all, and has instead arisen out of modern philosophy, which subsumed all human desire for activity under this one concept. According to the capitalist labor ontology, ancient farmers were “productive” when they tended their crops, medieval monks were “productive” when they copied the bible and other manuscripts by hand day after day, and the modern first grader is productive when they do their homework as soon as they get home from school. This conception of productivity is closely related to the abstraction of “labor” as a natural form of human activity present in all human societies (See Robert Kurz, Substance of Capital), and productivity can be seen, in this light, as the drive to engage in the only form of activity socially valid in capitalist society: labor. And so, according to modern philosophy, humans are naturally productive creatures that will feel utterly disparaged if they are deprived of the opportunity to do work.

But this is all a farce, an ideological construction of capitalist modernity created for the purpose of its own self-justification. Productivity as a positive concept did not exist before capitalism, and neither did its negative, “boredom.” While one can point to analogues of boredom, such as idleness or leisure, and say that they existed before capitalism, figures such as Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas viewed these as sources of happiness and fulfillment, not existential dread. Only after the Enlightenment, and the rise of capitalist modernity, were these things demonized, for being “bored” or “idle” meant not contributing to capitalist valorization, and therefore not contributing to society.

What effect does this all have on the modern commodity-subject? The answer to that can be derived from the drastic increase in alcohol sales that has taken place during the COVID-19 pandemic. Absent any form of structured productive activities, the commodity-subject is thrown into despair, completely unaware of what they ought to do with themselves. In response, they engage in a sort of “anti-productivity,” escaping boredom by drinking all day and staring at their screens. “Anything but boredom,” they reassure themselves, as they continue from episode to episode, season to season.

This “anti-productivity” is not productive in the capitalist sense,[2] nor does it substantially contribute to the development of any sort of meaningful or enjoyable life. It is mere distraction, escapism in all its pitiful glory. To be sure, what is happening during this outbreak is simply a reproduction of the daily life of the average worker, but on a longer timescale. The few hours after work and before bed that were previously devoted to this sort of “anti-productivity” now extend for weeks on end with the country on lockdown.

So to answer our question: no, boredom is not transhistorical. It is a historically specific conception of non-activity that has taken on a negative connotation because it is the opposite of the fetish category of productivity. Upon realizing this, we may feel a bit better about lounging around the house, sitting on the porch and watching the sun go by, ignoring our petty distractions as we observe and reflect on ourselves and the world around us. Boredom is not something to escape, but something to cherish, for it is in boredom that we are able to confront our most pressing thoughts in their most unadulterated form, and develop more satisfying lives as a result.

[1] Here I refer to a more personal notion of productivity, not to be confused with technological productivity, which has an entirely different meaning and is related to the production process.

[2] Strictly speaking, although it is important to note that most people spend their free time engaging in consumption, thus contributing to the cycle of capital accumulation. As my friend David Flechtner puts it: “We are always working.”

What do we do with ourselves?

The total domination of people by labor is such that, when given time off of work, they feel useless. That is the situation we find ourselves in amidst the global outbreak of COVID-19.

But this isn’t the result of some inherent propensity for people to want to be productive—it is the reflection of the logic of commodity production on people’s consciousness. Time not spent creating value is structurally useless in capitalist society, and so this free time appears useless in the reified consciousness of the modern commodity-subject.

The development of capitalism means the death of all hobbies. All activity that is not value creating is meaningless, according to capitalism, so people have no idea to do with themselves when they are temporarily liberated from the compulsion to go to work. Left to our own devices, most of us will get drunk, spend hours in front of a TV and scroll endlessly on our phones. Maybe it is time to ask grandma for a crochet needle and some yarn.

Or, maybe, it is a good time to reflect on what activities bring us excitement, joy, satisfaction, or relaxation. If nothing rings a bell, we can think about things we see other people doing that arouse our interests.

Granted, most people are now confined to their house, but this shouldn’t be much of a deterrence. Surely there are things around the house that have been neglected for too long. The hard part is realizing that they are worth engaging with.

Of course, there’s always the option of non-activity, the mortal sin of capitalist modernity. But this requires a bravery and discipline we are severely lacking today. What happens when you turn off your phone, the TV, and just sit down somewhere and wrestle with your thoughts? For most, just the thought of this brings about a terrible sense of fear. Unfortunately, the only way to overcome this is to confront it head on.